-10.2 C
New York
Monday, December 23, 2024

Learn how to use the RE-AIM framework to judge public well being interventions – Healthcare Economist






The RE-AIM framework developed by Glasgow et al. (1999) has 5 analysis elements.

  • Attain: share of individuals from a given inhabitants who take part in a program and their traits. For example, organizational attain with stakeholders might be oblique, supposed or direct. Attain is the variety of individuals in this system divided by the dimensions of the goal inhabitants.
  • Effectiveness: constructive and unfavorable program outcomes. These are usually measured because the share of individuals who expertise given constructive and unfavorable program outcomes. Along with affected person medical outcomes, different varieties of outcomes embody (i) behavioral outcomes for individuals (e.g., smoking cessation, consuming patterns, bodily exercise), (ii) outcomes for workers who ship an intervention (approaching sufferers, delivering prompts and counseling, making follow-up calls), and (iii) outcomes for the payers and purchasers who help the intervention (adopting an intervention, altering insurance policies). High quality of life also needs to be thought of reminiscent of affected person functioning, psychological well being, and shopper satisfaction.
  • Adoption: % of potential settings (e.g., organizations) and workers which have agreed to take part in this system. One may consider this as organizational buy-in. Adoption is often assessed by direct remark or structured interviews or surveys.
  • Implementation: the extent to which this system was delivered as supposed and its price. Implementation will be evaluated on the particular person and group ranges. On the particular person degree, one can measure participant follow-through or “adherence”; on the organizational degree, one can measure the share of workers members who implement this system as supposed.
  • Upkeep: upkeep of the first outcomes (>6 months) for people; sustainability of the delivered applications for organizations. For people, relapse or discontinuation is a problem and needs to be evaluated; on the organizational degree, one ought to measure the extent to which a well being promotion apply or coverage turns into routine and a part of the on a regular basis tradition and norms of a company.

A abstract of the 5 dimensions in desk type is under.

Learn how to use the RE-AIM framework to judge public well being interventions – Healthcare Economist
httpspubmedncbinlmnihgov10474547

Every of the 5 dimensions listed above is represented on a 0 to 1 (or 0% to 100%) scale. A part of the rationale for the title is that an intervention’s impression is a perform of it’s attain and effectiveness (Influence = Attain × Efficacy) as outlined by Abrams et al. (1996). Moreover, Effectiveness = Implementation × Efficacy. An intervention could also be efficacious, however it is just efficient if that intervention readily interprets to the real-world. Nonetheless, interventions could have a big impression in short-term research-based environments however will not be sustainable. The “AIM” part goals to extra fully characterize the general public well being impression of an intervention primarily based on organizational components. RE-AIM has been used to judge quite a lot of interventions reminiscent of:

A key query is whether or not RE-AIM can be utilized not just for particular person interventions, but in addition for multi-faceted interventions that concentrate on plenty of totally different stakeholders (e.g., suppliers, educators, others). A paper by Candy et al. 2014 notice that RE-AIM might be utilized to to multi-faceted intervention in one among 3 ways:

  1. Exercise particular method. Below this method, every exercise undertaken can be evaluated primarily based on the RE-AIM dimension it focused. “For example, awareness-raising methods would goal attain or adoption, bodily exercise promotion methods is likely to be used to enhance effectiveness and upkeep, and provider-training methods might be recognized as strategies to enhance adoption and implementation of evidence-based tips.”
  2. Additive method. On this methodology, data can be collected throughout the initiatives after which amalgamated to tell every RE-AIM dimension. For example, attain might be evaluated primarily based throughout all actions (e.g., mailers, web site visits, participant enrollment). This method permits for a great seize of total impression however not how any particular exercise moved the needle on a given RE-AIM dimension.
  3. Hybrid method. On this method, researchers resolve pragmatically which methods deserve a extra thorough RE-AIM analysis and that are greatest evaluated utilizing one or two RE-AIM dimensions. The choice is commonly decided ‘pragmatically’ primarily based on the views of the stakeholders. Swett et al. argues that this method “can velocity the combination of analysis, coverage and apply…[and] additionally scale back burden on individuals and accomplice organizations…”

The Candy al. 2014 paper applies the RE-AIM multifaceted framework to the SCI Motion Canada, which was an initiative whose mission was to ‘develop and mobilize methods to tell, train and allow individuals dwelling with SCI to provoke and preserve a bodily energetic way of life’. The precise metrics used as a part of their software of RE-AIM to the SCI Motion Canada intervention are proven under.

httpsimplementationsciencebiomedcentralcomarticles1011861748 5908 9 74

You possibly can learn extra about how they applied this method within the full paper right here.



How to use the RE-AIM framework to evaluate public health interventions

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com