The Federal Arbitration Act is being raised in additional courtroom proceedings as pre-empting state widespread legislation relating to appraisal. I famous this final month in Is Appraisal an Arbitration Beneath the Federal Arbitration Act?
One other federal courtroom in Maryland just lately dominated that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) preempts state legislation and governs appraisal of property loss disputes:1
Value determinations And The Federal Arbitration Act
This Court docket has held that, when figuring out whether or not an appraisal provision constitutes an enforceable arbitration clause beneath the FAA, thereby triggering the FAA, ‘[i]t is . . . irrelevant that the contract language in query doesn’t make use of the phrase ‘arbitration’ as such. Slightly, what’s essential is [whether] the events clearly supposed to submit some disputes to binding evaluate by a 3rd social gathering.’ Liberty Mut. Grp., Inc. v. Wright, 2012 WL 718857 at *5 (D. Md. Mar. 5, 2012)….see additionally Omaha v. Omaha Water Co., 218 U.S. 180, 194 (1910) (noting {that a} explicit dispute had concerned arbitration ‘although the arbitrators have been known as appraisers’). Federal courts have additionally used ‘differing verbal formulations’ to find out whether or not a specific dispute decision process constitutes ‘arbitration’ beneath the FAA….
…
… the Court docket doesn’t possess subject-matter jurisdiction to think about this dispute, as a result of the events’ appraisal dispute is topic to the FAA. As well as, Vacationers’ problem to Defendants’ appraiser is untimely, as a result of such a problem can’t be raised till after the events have accomplished the appraisal course of.
… the Court docket reads the appraisal provision within the Coverage to replicate the events’ intent to conduct an appraisal of the Property and to submit their dispute concerning the quantity of loss on the Property to binding evaluate by a third-party appraiser. As a result of the Coverage displays that the events agreed to submit their dispute to a third-party appraiser, the FAA governs this dispute.
Most appraisal circumstances in state courts haven’t raised or dominated on the problem of whether or not the FAA pre-empts state legislation. Nonetheless, if these latest circumstances are to be adopted, important modifications within the legislation of appraisal must be anticipated as a result of most have adopted state legislation and never the federal arbitration code for steering.
Within the put up, Is Appraisal an Arbitration Beneath the Federal Arbitration Act?, I famous my issues:
I’ve written about this concern in Is Appraisal Ruled Beneath the Federal Arbitration Act? and If Appraisal Is Ruled by the Federal Arbitration Act, What Is the Course of? I’d recommend that this concern may be very a lot at play in lots of states and that the FAA is usually missed. My guess is that the majority merely are ignorant about this authorized concern.
The underside line is that relying on state legislation, many courts could apply provisions of the FAA to appraisal. The issue is that many conducting value determinations usually are not conducting them pursuant to the provisions of the FAA. All is okay till any person raises this troublesome authorized concern as a technique to keep away from a perceived injustice from an appraisal award.
I don’t intend to throw a ‘monkey wrench’ into value determinations. Nonetheless, this legislation is creating, and practitioners, public adjusters, restoration contractors, in addition to events to the insurance coverage contract ought to concentrate on this case and others just like it. The arbitration course of and who could be an arbitrator may be very completely different from the standard appraisal and who qualifies as an appraiser.
The pattern in federal courtroom is obvious—the FAA pre-empts state courtroom legislation relating to appraisal. Sustain on this dynamic matter if you’re a celebration to appraisal, an appraiser, or umpire.
Thought For The Day
The world is altering very quick. Large is not going to beat small anymore. It is going to be the quick beating the sluggish.
—Rupert Murdoch
1 Vacationers Cas. Ins. Co. of America v. Papagiannopoulous, No. 8:22-cv-02314 (D. Md. July 27, 2023).
